American Men's Grand Slam Dry Spell Is Not Fritz's Burden to Bear

I possess some thoughts about that remarks delivered by ESPN commentator Chris Fowler after the Serbian champion's win over the American player in the US Open last eight. Look – the athlete represents American, Fowler is from the US – and sports often encourage patriotic sentiment. A little bit of letdown was understandable. Rather, Fowler brought up the continued absence of US male players at grand slam tournaments: not one of them has won a title since Andy Roddick in 2003, and Fritz had been the last one standing in the competition.

Everyone enjoy a narrative, myself included. But really. Even if the American had beaten Djokovic for the initial occasion, phenomenal talent Carlos Alcaraz was looming in the next round, who Fritz has never defeated in an competitive encounter. And had he someway gotten past that, it would have been title holder the Italian, versus him the American had dropped 10 of the previous eleven sets. Alcaraz and Sinner had also divided the previous seven major titles (plus the Spaniard went on to thrash a tired Djokovic in the next round). Fritz said in post-match interviews following his defeat that he actually liked his draw, because it offered the opportunity to defeat the three best players in the sport back-to-back. Fritz is more than within his right to aim for the accomplishment; an athlete is supposed to have faith in themselves. But entering that Serbian quarter-final who else in their right mind had the drought of US winners on the brain?

The American star's weaker delivery the only thing standing in her way and consistent victories

The American, twenty-eight, is ranked number four in the world starting this week’s year-end championships and has secured his previous six matches over third-ranked Alexander Zverev with growing comfort. Presumably he could claim that position for himself in the coming years. But it’s clear that at present, that’s as far as he can rise: The Italian and Spaniard sit a chasm of ranking points away. His top-class delivery and powerful strength on both front side and reverse side are sufficiently enough to defeat most opponents on the ATP tour. Against the handful of generational talents, though, Fritz is often overmatched. The past few years has witnessed the interesting emergence of tall, gangly athletes who can nonetheless move around with the alarming speed and grace of smaller players. Fritz is six-foot-five and looks it. His footwork is rigid, as if he’s still getting used to his limbs. So he’ll rarely win a rally that the other player was controlling, and playing a drop shot versus him is typically a reliable tactic. That acts as a pretty harsh limitation on his upside.

Fritz has achieved a several dramatic, unexpected improvements throughout his career. Early on of the ten-year period, he was circling the bottom of the top 30. 24 months after, he was sniffing the top 10. The previous season, he suddenly surged up to No 4 – and held the spot. But the subsequent step, mixing it up with and defeating all-time-greats like the young Spaniard, Sinner, and including a aging Serbian, is the highest of all. What could Fowler have been thinking? That Fritz, in 2025, was a legitimate contender to beat them all back-to-back? That it was worth mentioning the continuing slump of US male players lifting grand slams when he had exited the New York major in the quarter-finals? The desperation is just too much and the respect for the magnitude of the challenge too little.

The American star made a personal best run to the All England Club last four in the summer.

Fritz’s performance in that exact quarter-final should have been sufficient of an sign. Djokovic won in four rounds, a win that only felt uncertain for moments towards the very end, when Fritz had saved a couple championship opportunities and had a opportunity to maintain serve for 5-5. The duo looked well-balanced during the exchanges, with Fritz creating plenty of chances to win the opponent's serve. But the champion saved break point after break point, prolonging the run to the point of frustration. When he eventually did claim a single of the opportunities at 5-5 in the second set, he immediately played a horrendous game to drop serve once more; the Serbian had lulled him into a battle peripheral to the real battle and forced him to use far too much energy to prevail. Facing match points in the final game, Fritz’s primary delivery sailed to heaven. He extended the contest twice on his backup delivery, but ultimately double-faulted. It wasn’t a choke, I didn’t think, only a result of having to hit an excessive number of weaker deliveries.

The match was quite ironclad proof that the American is not good enough to defeat any version of Djokovic, that was defeated by Alcaraz in the next round and did not especially appeared like he believed he could triumph. This is absolutely acceptable – Djokovic is the best player ever, and might not be at the peak of his physical powers anymore, but has developed sufficient experience and tactical know-how to compensate for a significant portion of the decline. The issue is the individuals who were anticipating the American to win, and putting pressure on him to achieve that, when he was had not done anything that indicated he would.

The American is an valuable contributor to the circuit regardless. He’s a calm, reflective presence in media sessions, more so than almost anyone on the ATP except for the Russian star, prepared to not only say how he feels or the strategy he believed decided a match, but explain it. That he ought to shoulder the majority of the responsibility for America not produce a male major champion since Andy Roddick feels unjust. (Since the fellow American is rubbing shoulders with him in the standings, maybe they can divide that load.)

Year-End Championships: Singles Groups

Jimmy Connors Division

  • The Spanish phenom
  • The American contender
  • Alex de Minaur (Aus)
  • Lorenzo Musetti (It)

Bjorn Borg Division

  • Jannik Sinner (It)
  • The German powerhouse
  • Ben Shelton (US)
  • Félix Auger-Aliassime (Can)

“I’d probably think about it indefinitely if I don’t do it,” Fritz informed an interviewer in June of winning a major. It is hoped he realizes that he’s not a failure if he does not achieve that goal, that overcoming the Spanish and Italian's dominant, formidable empire is actually extremely unlikely for all other players. {

Pam Henry
Pam Henry

A Canadian journalist and cultural critic with over a decade of experience covering national and international affairs.