🔗 Share this article

The nation's decisive move to restrict social media access for those under 16 is sparking debate around the globe. Officials, child protection groups, and families are observing intently to see if this tactic will set a precedent for countries abroad.

European Trend

Across Europe, a rising chorus of countries are considering parallel measures.

• Denmark plans a ban on social media for children under fifteen, with the leader stating that mobile devices and platforms are "taking away our children's childhood". The policy may be passed in the coming year.
• Norway is preparing to implement a age restriction of 15, pointing to the need to shield young people from the "manipulative force of the algorithms".
• The Irish government is working on a digital ID system to confirm the age and identity of social media participants. Officials have suggested that an similar ban could be "one of the options under consideration".
• In The Spanish government, the prime minister has urged the legislature to enact a law raising the legal age for accessing social media to 16.
• In France, the head of state has proposed a ban for those under fifteen, and a parliamentary commission has endorsed a related step, potentially involving an overnight "internet blackout" for older teenagers.
• The government in The Netherlands has recommended guardians to prevent their youngsters from social media before 15.

At the EU level, the bloc's legislature has approved a non-binding statement calling for a ban for minors except if a parent decides otherwise is given. While it highlights of the "compulsive" quality of these services, the resolution does not establish enforceable legislation.

"A clear age barrier is a solid first step," stated a leading MEP driving the measure.

The UK: An Evidence-Based Stance

In the UK, the leadership has remained open to a possible ban, emphasizing that "no measure is off the table" but maintaining any action must be "based on robust research".

Last year, momentum gathered behind a proposal to introduce controls on social media use by under-16s, but it was eventually modified. Instead, the administration pledged to further research the matter.

Advocacy groups have expressed concerns. One foundation set up by the loved ones of a young person who was lost after viewing disturbing online content contends that a blanket age ban might not make platforms safer and could result in a "dangerous transition" of risk when users turn 16.

"Australia's ban is a answer to the failure of the tech sector to build tools that are safe and suitable for young users," said a prominent online safety campaigner.

The US: A State-by-State Picture

Across America, regulation is primarily occurring at the local level due to federal stalemate.

• Utah demands parental consent for under-18s to use social media and restricts nighttime use.
• The state of Florida has signed a bill prohibiting those below 14 from joining social media, though it is subject to court battles.
• The state of Virginia has approved a rule restricting minors to a single hour of social media time per day, with extra use needing parental permission.
• Georgia, Tennessee, and Louisiana have likewise introduced laws mandating parental consent for minors to create social media presences.

Even with bipartisan support and suggestions from various politicians to follow Australia's example, a US-wide ban is right now seen as a distant prospect.

International Outlook

Apart from the West, further nations are similarly considering moves.

• Malaysia intends to ban social media for those under sixteen beginning next year.
• The Brazilian authorities has lifted the minimum age for one major platform to 16.

But, global bodies take a more cautious position. Unicef has cautioned that social media bans have downsides and "could prove counterproductive". The agency points out that the internet can be a "vital connection" for vulnerable young people and that government action should not be a "replacement" for tech companies to invest in child safeguards.

While this worldwide debate continues, the policies of the Australian government and its followers show that policymakers internationally are increasingly content to wait for the industry to act voluntarily.