🔗 Share this article

The recent US national security strategy presents a flawed assessment of Europe. The document asserts that open-border policies and so-called "progressive" policies pose an grave threat to the continent's identity. Yet, this perspective rests on a fundamental misreading of the reality. The true challenge confronting Europe is not cultural but economic and technological backwardness.

The Stark Growth Divide Between the US and Europe

Statistics reveal a sobering picture. Between 2008 and 2023, American economic output surged by 87%, while a mere 13.5% growth for the EU. Over this time, EU GDP per capita fell from over three-quarters to just 50% of the American figure. Remarkably, even Mississippi now has a greater average income than several leading EU nations like Italy and France.

Currently, about 50% of the global 50 largest tech companies are American, while a mere four are from Europe.

The Innovation Shortfall: The Core Question

This widening economic gap is driven by stronger productivity growth in the United States, largely due to breakthroughs and better use of resources. The landscape of world technology leadership is decidedly US-centric. Over the past five decades, 241 US firms have grown into enterprises valued at more than $10bn, versus just 14 in Europe.

This disparity raises a vital question: In the race for future industries like semiconductors, AI, and fusion energy, what is Europe stand? Most analysts concede it is largely a two-horse race between the United States and China, with European nations entering at a clear disadvantage.

Root Causes of the Continent's Technological Lag

A number of key reasons account for this technological divide.

• Financing Ecosystem: The US boasts a much more robust and more dynamic system for financing new ventures. The EU has yet to establish a true capital markets union, which caps the scale of new firms.
• Bureaucratic Hurdles: Excessive and fragmented rules hamper Europe. A American entrepreneur can introduce a service under a single set of laws to access a market of over 330 million. The European Union, despite a larger population size, is divided among twenty-seven different national regimes, creating huge internal barriers.
• Mindset Differences: Views on entrepreneurial failure differ sharply. In parts of Europe, business failure was historically met with stigma, whereas in the United States, it is often considered a badge of experience.
• Defense Spending: The United States enjoys a deeply integrated innovation pipeline linking defense and academia. The continent's long-term lack of spending in defense has eroded its capacity for breakthrough innovation.

A Path Forward: Grounds for Hopefulness

Despite these hurdles, one can find reasons for optimism. Policymakers are increasingly aware of the severe threat and have started to propose serious reform. Key analyses on European competitiveness and the internal market point to the need for major changes.

Given appropriate policies and rule changes, these assets might enable much higher degrees of commercial innovation.

The continent still possesses considerable advantages: high-quality workforce, top-tier education systems, and world-class research institutions. Coupled with a vast domestic consumer base and high savings rates, these foundations could unleash a new wave of investment and entrepreneurship.

Crucially, even if the EU does not take the lead in developing next-generation technologies, it can still significantly boost economic output by adopting and adapting innovations from other regions.

A Critical Juncture

The European Union now faces a decisive crossroads. To paraphrase a famous line, decline often happens "gradually and then suddenly". To date, Europe's technological decline has been gradual. But, if it fails to take decisive action to address its deep-seated problems, today's slow erosion could give way to a rapid and permanent loss of world influence.